Camera PV 2007 » Digital Camera » Troll
Troll
Question:
Groups please don’t feed the troll. Trolls thrive on flames. They don’t have anything else to do since they are asexual. They reproduce by binary means. Just ignore them. If you must respond, just refer to them by the correct term, Troll! Dear Troll, Nope, just against trolls! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the > fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also > against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save > lives. > Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? > You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. > (ken) > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it 
> > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample > x-no-archive:yes > Many have put Ken in their kill files. > I suggest everyone do the same. > I certainly hate that he has invaded rec..pets.dogs.health > I have not INVADED a damned thing. I gave my opinion. If you don’t like > it, post a logical response or shut the hell up. OK? > Whatever you do, do not allow him to lure you into an ongoing debate. > It seems that even veteran poster continue to engage him. > A troll is a troll. Ken is the worst. IGNORE. > Syd > Here we have the CLASSIC HALL MONITOR telling you "who" you can and > cannot respond to. > They spend most of their Internet lives trying to control your > movements, thoughts, and participation in various newsgroups. > Now they object when I complain about a doctor passing by an injured > human or animal. > Sheesh! Get a fucking life. Please. Buy one, rent one, borrow one, or > steal one — but quit monitoring the HALLWAYS here. > (ken) > — > See some sample photos taken with my Olympus digital camera at: > http://www.theupperdeck.com/digitcam/ > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><><><><><><><><>
Response:
Dear Troll, Nope, just against trolls! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the > fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also > against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save > lives. > Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? > You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. > (ken) > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample
Response:
worse……a "control freak"…..oh help me I’m so scared!! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >x-no-archive:yes > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: >Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the >fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also >against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save >lives. >Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? >You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. >(ken) >– >See some sample photos taken with my Olympus digital camera at: >http://www.theupperdeck.com/digitcam/ ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><><><><><><><><>
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Sorry groups, >Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross >posts. This way he gets past all the filters. >An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken)
Yes, potty-mouth (ken) thinks that everyone who disagrees with him is a hall monitor. He can cross-post all he wants, but no one can e-mail him. Living in the world according to (ken)’s rules can be confusing, foks. Another interesting thing about (ken) the vet-basher is that one could ask him the same thing that he asked Elaine. Don’t know if I’ve ever seen anything constructive from (ken). Sally Hennessey – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> — > See some sample
Response:
Sorry groups, Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross posts. This way he gets past all the filters. An example of his trolling: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > else does this to every post they start…. > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample
Response:
Can someone define "troll" since I have seen it used a lot in this group recently?
Response:
> Can someone define "troll" since I have seen it used a lot in this group > recently?
A troll is somebody who "trolls" newsgroups starting fights/arguments just for the fun of it — someone who goes fishing for suckers who rise to the bait; someone who says provocative things just to get a rise out of people. You can usually spot the pure trolls a mile away by, among other things, a less-than-literate use of the English language. However, the word "troll" has also become a catch-all rallying cry for people who don’t like someone else’s argument. One’s man’s legitimate point is another man’s trolling. Trollism is to newsgroups in the 1990s what McCarthyism was to political discussion in the 1950s. You yell "troll" and it’s like yelling "commie." You can tar someone with no evidence or discussion. This newsgroup, and other dog newsgroups, seems to have more than its share of people who are a little, or more than a little, paranoid about alleged trolls. According to them, the dog groups have more than their share of trolls 
. You’ll see them yelling "troll alert" at every opportunity. Sometimes the line between trolling and just talking is a thin one. However, you can usually make a decision based on the history of a person’s posting. Someone like Michael Patton, for example, aka "Dog Game…..", is a professional troll, never posting legitimate questions or useful information, yet always trying to provoke reactions. Someone like myself is more of an amateur, dabbling in trolling for specific fish, fish like Patton. tim in elora
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Can someone define "troll" since I have seen it used a lot in this group > recently? > A troll is somebody who "trolls" newsgroups starting fights/arguments > just for the fun of it — someone who goes fishing for suckers who rise > to the bait; someone who says provocative things just to get a rise out > of people. You can usually spot the pure trolls a mile away by, among > other things, a less-than-literate use of the English language. > However, the word "troll" has also become a catch-all rallying cry for > people who don’t like someone else’s argument. One’s man’s legitimate > point is another man’s trolling. Trollism is to newsgroups in the 1990s > what McCarthyism was to political discussion in the 1950s. You yell > "troll" and it’s like yelling "commie." You can tar someone with no > evidence or discussion. > This newsgroup, and other dog newsgroups, seems to have more than its > share of people who are a little, or more than a little, paranoid about > alleged trolls. According to them, the dog groups have more than their > share of trolls . You’ll see them yelling "troll alert" at every > opportunity. > Sometimes the line between trolling and just talking is a thin one. > However, you can usually make a decision based on the history of a > person’s posting. Someone like Michael Patton, for example, aka "Dog > Game…..", is a professional troll, never posting legitimate questions > or useful information, yet always trying to provoke reactions. > Someone like myself is more of an amateur, dabbling in trolling for > specific fish, fish like Patton. > tim in elora
Why Tim, you are just a little commie! (How did I do? Do I have it down right?) Thanks.
Response:
>Dear Troll, >Nope, just against trolls! > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters.
Many have put Ken in their kill files. I suggest everyone do the same. I certainly hate that he has invaded rec..pets.dogs.health Whatever you do, do not allow him to lure you into an ongoing debate. It seems that even veteran poster continue to engage him. A troll is a troll. Ken is the worst. IGNORE. Syd
Response:
Groups please don’t feed the troll. Trolls thrive on flames. They don’t have anything else to do since they are asexual. They reproduce by binary means. Just ignore them. If you must respond, just refer to them by the correct term, Troll! Dear Troll, Nope, just against trolls! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the > fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also > against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save > lives. > Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? > You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. > (ken) > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample > x-no-archive:yes > Many have put Ken in their kill files. > I suggest everyone do the same. > I certainly hate that he has invaded rec..pets.dogs.health > I have not INVADED a damned thing. I gave my opinion. If you don’t like > it, post a logical response or shut the hell up. OK? > Whatever you do, do not allow him to lure you into an ongoing debate. > It seems that even veteran poster continue to engage him. > A troll is a troll. Ken is the worst. IGNORE. > Syd > Here we have the CLASSIC HALL MONITOR telling you "who" you can and > cannot respond to. > They spend most of their Internet lives trying to control your > movements, thoughts, and participation in various newsgroups. > Now they object when I complain about a doctor passing by an injured > human or animal. > Sheesh! Get a fucking life. Please. Buy one, rent one, borrow one, or > steal one — but quit monitoring the HALLWAYS here. > (ken) > — > See some sample photos taken with my Olympus digital camera at: > http://www.theupperdeck.com/digitcam/ > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><><><><><><><><>
Response:
Dear Troll, Nope, just against trolls! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the > fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also > against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save > lives. > Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? > You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. > (ken) > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample
Response:
worse……a "control freak"…..oh help me I’m so scared!! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >x-no-archive:yes > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: >Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the >fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also >against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save >lives. >Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? >You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. >(ken) >– >See some sample photos taken with my Olympus digital camera at: >http://www.theupperdeck.com/digitcam/ ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><><><><><><><><>
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Sorry groups, >Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross >posts. This way he gets past all the filters. >An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken)
Yes, potty-mouth (ken) thinks that everyone who disagrees with him is a hall monitor. He can cross-post all he wants, but no one can e-mail him. Living in the world according to (ken)’s rules can be confusing, foks. Another interesting thing about (ken) the vet-basher is that one could ask him the same thing that he asked Elaine. Don’t know if I’ve ever seen anything constructive from (ken). Sally Hennessey – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> — > See some sample
Response:
Sorry groups, Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross posts. This way he gets past all the filters. An example of his trolling: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > else does this to every post they start…. > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample
Response:
Can someone define "troll" since I have seen it used a lot in this group recently?
Response:
> Can someone define "troll" since I have seen it used a lot in this group > recently?
A troll is somebody who "trolls" newsgroups starting fights/arguments just for the fun of it — someone who goes fishing for suckers who rise to the bait; someone who says provocative things just to get a rise out of people. You can usually spot the pure trolls a mile away by, among other things, a less-than-literate use of the English language. However, the word "troll" has also become a catch-all rallying cry for people who don’t like someone else’s argument. One’s man’s legitimate point is another man’s trolling. Trollism is to newsgroups in the 1990s what McCarthyism was to political discussion in the 1950s. You yell "troll" and it’s like yelling "commie." You can tar someone with no evidence or discussion. This newsgroup, and other dog newsgroups, seems to have more than its share of people who are a little, or more than a little, paranoid about alleged trolls. According to them, the dog groups have more than their share of trolls . You’ll see them yelling "troll alert" at every opportunity. Sometimes the line between trolling and just talking is a thin one. However, you can usually make a decision based on the history of a person’s posting. Someone like Michael Patton, for example, aka "Dog Game…..", is a professional troll, never posting legitimate questions or useful information, yet always trying to provoke reactions. Someone like myself is more of an amateur, dabbling in trolling for specific fish, fish like Patton. tim in elora
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Can someone define "troll" since I have seen it used a lot in this group > recently? > A troll is somebody who "trolls" newsgroups starting fights/arguments > just for the fun of it — someone who goes fishing for suckers who rise > to the bait; someone who says provocative things just to get a rise out > of people. You can usually spot the pure trolls a mile away by, among > other things, a less-than-literate use of the English language. > However, the word "troll" has also become a catch-all rallying cry for > people who don’t like someone else’s argument. One’s man’s legitimate > point is another man’s trolling. Trollism is to newsgroups in the 1990s > what McCarthyism was to political discussion in the 1950s. You yell > "troll" and it’s like yelling "commie." You can tar someone with no > evidence or discussion. > This newsgroup, and other dog newsgroups, seems to have more than its > share of people who are a little, or more than a little, paranoid about > alleged trolls. According to them, the dog groups have more than their > share of trolls . You’ll see them yelling "troll alert" at every > opportunity. > Sometimes the line between trolling and just talking is a thin one. > However, you can usually make a decision based on the history of a > person’s posting. Someone like Michael Patton, for example, aka "Dog > Game…..", is a professional troll, never posting legitimate questions > or useful information, yet always trying to provoke reactions. > Someone like myself is more of an amateur, dabbling in trolling for > specific fish, fish like Patton. > tim in elora
Why Tim, you are just a little commie! (How did I do? Do I have it down right?) Thanks.
Response:
>Dear Troll, >Nope, just against trolls! > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters.
Many have put Ken in their kill files. I suggest everyone do the same. I certainly hate that he has invaded rec..pets.dogs.health Whatever you do, do not allow him to lure you into an ongoing debate. It seems that even veteran poster continue to engage him. A troll is a troll. Ken is the worst. IGNORE. Syd
Response:
Groups please don’t feed the troll. Trolls thrive on flames. They don’t have anything else to do since they are asexual. They reproduce by binary means. Just ignore them. If you must respond, just refer to them by the correct term, Troll! Dear Troll, Nope, just against trolls! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the > fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also > against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save > lives. > Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? > You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. > (ken) > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample > x-no-archive:yes > Many have put Ken in their kill files. > I suggest everyone do the same. > I certainly hate that he has invaded rec..pets.dogs.health > I have not INVADED a damned thing. I gave my opinion. If you don’t like > it, post a logical response or shut the hell up. OK? > Whatever you do, do not allow him to lure you into an ongoing debate. > It seems that even veteran poster continue to engage him. > A troll is a troll. Ken is the worst. IGNORE. > Syd > Here we have the CLASSIC HALL MONITOR telling you "who" you can and > cannot respond to. > They spend most of their Internet lives trying to control your > movements, thoughts, and participation in various newsgroups. > Now they object when I complain about a doctor passing by an injured > human or animal. > Sheesh! Get a fucking life. Please. Buy one, rent one, borrow one, or > steal one — but quit monitoring the HALLWAYS here. > (ken) > — > See some sample photos taken with my Olympus digital camera at: > http://www.theupperdeck.com/digitcam/ > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><><><><><><><><>
Response:
Dear Troll, Nope, just against trolls! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the > fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also > against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save > lives. > Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? > You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. > (ken) > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample
Response:
worse……a "control freak"…..oh help me I’m so scared!! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >x-no-archive:yes > Sorry groups, > Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross > posts. This way he gets past all the filters. > An example of his trolling: >Oh Geez, another "Hall Monitor" with forged headers! Can’t stand the >fact that some vets pass injured animals in the roadways. Are you also >against the use of CPR, or should only MD’s and Vets be PAID to save >lives. >Please don’t tell me you are really AGAINST SAVING LIVES! Please? >You’re really putting your talents (and Giganews.com) to good use. >(ken) >– >See some sample photos taken with my Olympus digital camera at: >http://www.theupperdeck.com/digitcam/ ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><><><><><><><><>
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Sorry groups, >Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross >posts. This way he gets past all the filters. >An example of his trolling: > > Hi, > > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > > else does this to every post they start…. > > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken)
Yes, potty-mouth (ken) thinks that everyone who disagrees with him is a hall monitor. He can cross-post all he wants, but no one can e-mail him. Living in the world according to (ken)’s rules can be confusing, foks. Another interesting thing about (ken) the vet-basher is that one could ask him the same thing that he asked Elaine. Don’t know if I’ve ever seen anything constructive from (ken). Sally Hennessey – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> — > See some sample
Response:
Sorry groups, Our Pet Troll Ken likes to expand to other groups so he can get cross posts. This way he gets past all the filters. An example of his trolling: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > I just read in one of my other newsgroups about "taking over troll > threads". Apparently if you go to reply to the message, but remove the > subject line and then put TR and a *relevant* subject, you turn the > thread into something relevant to the group. (TR stands for troll > response, but it’s a way of alerting all the group to what you’re > doing) Apparently the trolls will get tired and go away if everyone > else does this to every post they start…. > Don’t know if it works but you could try it > Elaine > Hi Elaine! > BTW, you’re fucking idiot and a possible "Hall Monitor." It would be in > your best interest to mind your own business. > Since when is a discussion about saving lifes (CPR) of humans and > animals — considered TROLLING? > Have you NOTHING constructive to add to these discussions? > (ken) > — > See some sample
Response:
Nothing at all! I’m honored <G> Thumper – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Well you’re popular with me, what more could you ask for?? ;-) > -judy > hhhehehehehe. > I have told people, on occasion, that they were the son of a bitch’s > mother’s crablice. I heard that one was quite colorful to many. Aside > from mild outbursts such as those, I think I’m just dandy. Just not > popular with all. OHHH well. > Thumper > Gimme some wierd mood. > > Hey there, honey, I was catching up so I sent this post before I saw the > > apologies, sorry! :-) > > Anyways, I don’t think any of your posts (excluding said post) have come > off > > as bitchy. I think you do just fine, however, I don’t consider > > intellectually challenging posts to be bitchy either, so I guess I just > > don’t see your other posts as bitchy! Can we say redundancy? > > lol > > -judy > > *in a wierd mood* > > > > Heya Thump, > > > > I am only speaking for me when I say that I had no idea that their > was a > > > > problem with using peoples’ real names. I can understand why there > > would be > > > > and all, however, I had never thought about it previously and now am > > > > wondering if I have ever used *your* name specifically in posts that > I > > have > > > > written to you. > > > No. You havent <G>. > > > Just wondering…I do think that maybe Kaji didn’t know > > > > though and you might have been just a *little* hard on her. > > > Perhaps, and that is why I posted an apology for the harshness of my > > > tone. People seemed to have missed that and continue to jump to Kaji’s > > > defense, as if I were continuing some tirade against her. I am not. > > > > Please don’t think I am trying to jump into the middle here, it’s > just > > that > > > > I am almost positive that I would have done the same and would be > > absolutely > > > > shocked if I had gotten the same response from you. Actually I have > > never > > > > seen you angry, so your post shocked me regardless. > > > Heh-if you ever want to, scroll through some of my posts. <G> I can > be > > > a real bitch, usually either blatantly blunt or logically sarcastic. I > > > is who I is. > > > I understand where you’re coming from, but you should know that we > have > > > made up (I think.) > > > SMOOOCH G|F > > > See you round the cafe…. > > > Thump > > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > > -judy > > > > > >> ThumpThumpThump > > > > > >So now I’m a bitch am I… well gee thanks for your high opinon > of my > > > > > >parentege… I’ll tell them should I. > > > > > It doesnt matter to me. Do what you wish. > > > > > >sorry to offend you your highness… > > > > > I claim no highness, just request, like many members of the group > hav > > > > > over various times, that our first names be used. > > > > > but I made a simple error because I > > > > > >DID NOT KNOW that you were so thing about it… don’t worry > yourself > > now > > > > > >- in answer to your request, I will never talk to you again – I > know > > you > > > > > >don’t want me here in the first place. > > > > > I never said such a thing. Could you point out the post in which I > > > > > said it, to back up that allegation? > > > > > >So that’s it from me for now, to you anyway… > > > > > As I said, whatever you wish. > > > > > >Have a nice life person of possibly female gender or possibly > > something > > > > > >else entirely… > > > > > My gender is meaningless. Why the insult? I apologise for > calling > > > > > you a bitch. > > > > > >Karen, who is NOT afraid to use her name in posts. > > > > > Some people in this world are changing jobs, and do not want thier > > > > > first names posted all over tarnation. Like it or not stigma > exists. > > > > > >PS Want me to killfile you so there is no chance of my ever > > accidentally > > > > > >offending again? > > > > > Again, that is up to you. > > > > > Would that satisfy your ladyship??? > > > > > ? You think I’m no lady and I’m certainly not a ship, and why you > > > > > seem to think that I have placed myself on a pedestal I do not > know. > > > > > I apologized for the bitch comment–it just seemed to incredibly > > > > > obvious to not use a persons name without permission. > > > > > Thumper > > > > > Thumper > > > > > ThumpThumpThump
Response:
well I always both yours and Gerald’s threads..even though I never posted to any of them..Every time I post different views, I am called a troll..just just one troll, but every troll there ever was..may I join this grp of independent ppl?? thanks
Response:
I have been accused of being a troll. WTF Thumper
Response:
hahahahaha no way lolol Thanks for the giggle. Linda – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >I have been accused of being a troll. >WTF >Thumper
Response:
> I have been accused of being a troll. > WTF
IGNORE that accusation…it is false. Somebody else just trying to stir up trouble. Hey!.= Wanna trade my "psychopath" label from a certain poster? <VBF> Love, Lynda — Lynda
Response:
I thought it was false as well. I shouldnt have said anything…I’m kind of pining for correspondence I suppose, you psychopath. <G> I think it was intended to mean that I can be cold, coarse, insensitive. Which indeed is sometimes the case. Thumper – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I have been accused of being a troll. > WTF > IGNORE that accusation…it is false. Somebody else just trying to stir > up trouble. > Hey!.= Wanna trade my "psychopath" label from a certain poster? <VBF> > Love, > Lynda > — > Lynda
Response:
Welcome to the "alleged Trolls club". If you have anything meaningful to say someone will eventually call you a troll. I’ve learned a lot from your posts. I’m unusually impressed by your responses to people that I consider "trolls", who can usually be identified by the number of crossposts in the header. It often makes me glad that someone responded to an issue and did it in a well reasoned fashion, it saves me having to try to make the same points, … less effectively. I usually have to resist doing a "your so right", "ditto", or "very well put" type of post in response to yours. > I have been accused of being a troll. > WTF > Thumper
Garland Hopkins Art of Garland Hopkins http://garland.galacticworlds.com Sculpture of Garland http://garland.galacticworlds.com/THECD/Sculpt1/sculpt1.html
Response:
Thank you very much for your kind words, Garland. I smile! Thumper – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Welcome to the "alleged Trolls club". If you have anything meaningful > to say someone will eventually call you a troll. I’ve learned a lot from > your posts. I’m unusually impressed by your responses to people that I > consider "trolls", who can usually be identified by the number of > crossposts in the header. It often makes me glad that someone responded > to an issue and did it in a well reasoned fashion, it saves me having to > try to make the same points, … less effectively. I usually have to > resist doing a "your so right", "ditto", or "very well put" type of post > in response to yours. > I have been accused of being a troll. > WTF > Thumper > Garland Hopkins > Art of Garland Hopkins > http://garland.galacticworlds.com > Sculpture of Garland > http://garland.galacticworlds.com/THECD/Sculpt1/sculpt1.html
Response:
Yup. Ditto. Well put! — Eileen [The world will go as it wills; not as you or I would have it. MZB]
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Welcome to the "alleged Trolls club". If you have anything meaningful > to say someone will eventually call you a troll. I’ve learned a lot from > your posts. I’m unusually impressed by your responses to people that I > consider "trolls", who can usually be identified by the number of > crossposts in the header. It often makes me glad that someone responded > to an issue and did it in a well reasoned fashion, it saves me having to > try to make the same points, … less effectively. I usually have to > resist doing a "your so right", "ditto", or "very well put" type of post > in response to yours. > I have been accused of being a troll. > WTF > Thumper > Garland Hopkins > Art of Garland Hopkins > http://garland.galacticworlds.com > Sculpture of Garland > http://garland.galacticworlds.com/THECD/Sculpt1/sculpt1.html
Response:
silly…so not – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >I have been accused of being a troll. >WTF >Thumper
Response:
> I have been accused of being a troll. > WTF > Thumper
Hmmm… You’re a pretty funny-looking Troll Tracy [huggles] Karen — Kaji/Karenji – dragon/human/kitty Shifter depending on mood… *New Dragon Code COMING (one blue moon or another) *ICQ 55339701 – feel free to message me to chat *http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~gsj/Index.html *Wingsister to Viri, Tanith, Hespa, KiS and Caitlin/Amberynth *Lover of Chocolate, and Occasional Giver of Chocolate Points *Self-Appointed Guardian of the Southern Spring *Keeper of the Sunnydale Lost and Found
Response:
> KAJI. Kindly REFRAIN. You know what I mean. > THUMPER > Thumper > ThumpThumpThump
Actually I don’t… but if you don’t want me to talk to you that’s fine with me… seeya whoever. — Kaji/Karenji – dragon/human/kitty Shifter depending on mood… *New Dragon Code COMING (one blue moon or another) *ICQ 55339701 – feel free to message me to chat *http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~gsj/Index.html *Wingsister to Viri, Tanith, Hespa, KiS and Caitlin/Amberynth *Lover of Chocolate, and Occasional Giver of Chocolate Points *Self-Appointed Guardian of the Southern Spring *Keeper of the Sunnydale Lost and Found
Response:
> DO NOT USE MY NAME IN THE NEWSGROUP. > Simple enough for you, little bitch? > Thumper > ThumpThumpThump
So now I’m a bitch am I… well gee thanks for your high opinon of my parentege… I’ll tell them should I. sorry to offend you your highness… but I made a simple error because I DID NOT KNOW that you were so thing about it… don’t worry yourself now – in answer to your request, I will never talk to you again – I know you don’t want me here in the first place. So that’s it from me for now, to you anyway… Have a nice life person of possibly female gender or possibly something else entirely… Karen, who is NOT afraid to use her name in posts. PS Want me to killfile you so there is no chance of my ever accidentally offending again? Would that satisfy your ladyship??? — Kaji/Karenji – dragon/human/kitty Shifter depending on mood… *New Dragon Code COMING (one blue moon or another) *ICQ 55339701 – feel free to message me to chat *http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~gsj/Index.html *Wingsister to Viri, Tanith, Hespa, KiS and Caitlin/Amberynth *Lover of Chocolate, and Occasional Giver of Chocolate Points *Self-Appointed Guardian of the Southern Spring *Keeper of the Sunnydale Lost and Found
Response:
Heya Thump, I am only speaking for me when I say that I had no idea that their was a problem with using peoples’ real names. I can understand why there would be and all, however, I had never thought about it previously and now am wondering if I have ever used *your* name specifically in posts that I have written to you. Just wondering…I do think that maybe Kaji didn’t know though and you might have been just a *little* hard on her. Please don’t think I am trying to jump into the middle here, it’s just that I am almost positive that I would have done the same and would be absolutely shocked if I had gotten the same response from you. Actually I have never seen you angry, so your post shocked me regardless. Just my 2 cents. -judy
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> ThumpThumpThump >So now I’m a bitch am I… well gee thanks for your high opinon of my >parentege… I’ll tell them should I. > It doesnt matter to me. Do what you wish. >sorry to offend you your highness… > I claim no highness, just request, like many members of the group hav > over various times, that our first names be used. > but I made a simple error because I >DID NOT KNOW that you were so thing about it… don’t worry yourself now >- in answer to your request, I will never talk to you again – I know you >don’t want me here in the first place. > I never said such a thing. Could you point out the post in which I > said it, to back up that allegation? >So that’s it from me for now, to you anyway… > As I said, whatever you wish. >Have a nice life person of possibly female gender or possibly something >else entirely… > My gender is meaningless. Why the insult? I apologise for calling > you a bitch. >Karen, who is NOT afraid to use her name in posts. > Some people in this world are changing jobs, and do not want thier > first names posted all over tarnation. Like it or not stigma exists. >PS Want me to killfile you so there is no chance of my ever accidentally >offending again? > Again, that is up to you. > Would that satisfy your ladyship??? > ? You think I’m no lady and I’m certainly not a ship, and why you > seem to think that I have placed myself on a pedestal I do not know. > I apologized for the bitch comment–it just seemed to incredibly > obvious to not use a persons name without permission. > Thumper > Thumper > ThumpThumpThump
Response:
> Heya Thump, > I am only speaking for me when I say that I had no idea that their was a > problem with using peoples’ real names. I can understand why there would be > and all, however, I had never thought about it previously and now am > wondering if I have ever used *your* name specifically in posts that I have > written to you.
No. You havent <G>. Just wondering…I do think that maybe Kaji didn’t know > though and you might have been just a *little* hard on her.
Perhaps, and that is why I posted an apology for the harshness of my tone. People seemed to have missed that and continue to jump to Kaji’s defense, as if I were continuing some tirade against her. I am not. > Please don’t think I am trying to jump into the middle here, it’s just that > I am almost positive that I would have done the same and would be absolutely > shocked if I had gotten the same response from you. Actually I have never > seen you angry, so your post shocked me regardless.
Heh-if you ever want to, scroll through some of my posts. <G> I can be a real bitch, usually either blatantly blunt or logically sarcastic. I is who I is. I understand where you’re coming from, but you should know that we have made up (I think.) SMOOOCH G|F See you round the cafe…. Thump – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Just my 2 cents. > -judy > >> ThumpThumpThump > >So now I’m a bitch am I… well gee thanks for your high opinon of my > >parentege… I’ll tell them should I. > It doesnt matter to me. Do what you wish. > >sorry to offend you your highness… > I claim no highness, just request, like many members of the group hav > over various times, that our first names be used. > but I made a simple error because I > >DID NOT KNOW that you were so thing about it… don’t worry yourself now > >- in answer to your request, I will never talk to you again – I know you > >don’t want me here in the first place. > I never said such a thing. Could you point out the post in which I > said it, to back up that allegation? > >So that’s it from me for now, to you anyway… > As I said, whatever you wish. > >Have a nice life person of possibly female gender or possibly something > >else entirely… > My gender is meaningless. Why the insult? I apologise for calling > you a bitch. > >Karen, who is NOT afraid to use her name in posts. > Some people in this world are changing jobs, and do not want thier > first names posted all over tarnation. Like it or not stigma exists. > >PS Want me to killfile you so there is no chance of my ever accidentally > >offending again? > Again, that is up to you. > Would that satisfy your ladyship??? > ? You think I’m no lady and I’m certainly not a ship, and why you > seem to think that I have placed myself on a pedestal I do not know. > I apologized for the bitch comment–it just seemed to incredibly > obvious to not use a persons name without permission. > Thumper > Thumper > ThumpThumpThump
Response:
Hey there, honey, I was catching up so I sent this post before I saw the apologies, sorry! :-) Anyways, I don’t think any of your posts (excluding said post) have come off as bitchy. I think you do just fine, however, I don’t consider intellectually challenging posts to be bitchy either, so I guess I just don’t see your other posts as bitchy! Can we say redundancy? lol -judy *in a wierd mood*
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Heya Thump, > I am only speaking for me when I say that I had no idea that their was a > problem with using peoples’ real names. I can understand why there would be > and all, however, I had never thought about it previously and now am > wondering if I have ever used *your* name specifically in posts that I have > written to you. > No. You havent <G>. > Just wondering…I do think that maybe Kaji didn’t know > though and you might have been just a *little* hard on her. > Perhaps, and that is why I posted an apology for the harshness of my > tone. People seemed to have missed that and continue to jump to Kaji’s > defense, as if I were continuing some tirade against her. I am not. > Please don’t think I am trying to jump into the middle here, it’s just that > I am almost positive that I would have done the same and would be absolutely > shocked if I had gotten the same response from you. Actually I have never > seen you angry, so your post shocked me regardless. > Heh-if you ever want to, scroll through some of my posts. <G> I can be > a real bitch, usually either blatantly blunt or logically sarcastic. I > is who I is. > I understand where you’re coming from, but you should know that we have > made up (I think.) > SMOOOCH G|F > See you round the cafe…. > Thump > Just my 2 cents. > -judy > > >> ThumpThumpThump > > >So now I’m a bitch am I… well gee thanks for your high opinon of my > > >parentege… I’ll tell them should I. > > It doesnt matter to me. Do what you wish. > > >sorry to offend you your highness… > > I claim no highness, just request, like many members of the group hav > > over various times, that our first names be used. > > but I made a simple error because I > > >DID NOT KNOW that you were so thing about it… don’t worry yourself now > > >- in answer to your request, I will never talk to you again – I know you > > >don’t want me here in the first place. > > I never said such a thing. Could you point out the post in which I > > said it, to back up that allegation? > > >So that’s it from me for now, to you anyway… > > As I said, whatever you wish. > > >Have a nice life person of possibly female gender or possibly something > > >else entirely… > > My gender is meaningless. Why the insult? I apologise for calling > > you a bitch. > > >Karen, who is NOT afraid to use her name in posts. > > Some people in this world are changing jobs, and do not want thier > > first names posted all over tarnation. Like it or not stigma exists. > > >PS Want me to killfile you so there is no chance of my ever accidentally > > >offending again? > > Again, that is up to you. > > Would that satisfy your ladyship??? > > ? You think I’m no lady and I’m certainly not a ship, and why you > > seem to think that I have placed myself on a pedestal I do not know. > > I apologized for the bitch comment–it just seemed to incredibly > > obvious to not use a persons name without permission. > > Thumper > > Thumper > > ThumpThumpThump
Response:
Well you’re popular with me, what more could you ask for?? ;-) -judy
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> hhhehehehehe. > I have told people, on occasion, that they were the son of a bitch’s > mother’s crablice. I heard that one was quite colorful to many. Aside > from mild outbursts such as those, I think I’m just dandy. Just not > popular with all. OHHH well. > Thumper > Gimme some wierd mood. > Hey there, honey, I was catching up so I sent this post before I saw the > apologies, sorry! :-) > Anyways, I don’t think any of your posts (excluding said post) have come off > as bitchy. I think you do just fine, however, I don’t consider > intellectually challenging posts to be bitchy either, so I guess I just > don’t see your other posts as bitchy! Can we say redundancy? > lol > -judy > *in a wierd mood* > > > Heya Thump, > > > I am only speaking for me when I say that I had no idea that their was a > > > problem with using peoples’ real names. I can understand why there > would be > > > and all, however, I had never thought about it previously and now am > > > wondering if I have ever used *your* name specifically in posts that I > have > > > written to you. > > No. You havent <G>. > > Just wondering…I do think that maybe Kaji didn’t know > > > though and you might have been just a *little* hard on her. > > Perhaps, and that is why I posted an apology for the harshness of my > > tone. People seemed to have missed that and continue to jump to Kaji’s > > defense, as if I were continuing some tirade against her. I am not. > > > Please don’t think I am trying to jump into the middle here, it’s just > that > > > I am almost positive that I would have done the same and would be > absolutely > > > shocked if I had gotten the same response from you. Actually I have > never > > > seen you angry, so your post shocked me regardless. > > Heh-if you ever want to, scroll through some of my posts. <G> I can be > > a real bitch, usually either blatantly blunt or logically sarcastic. I > > is who I is. > > I understand where you’re coming from, but you should know that we have > > made up (I think.) > > SMOOOCH G|F > > See you round the cafe…. > > Thump > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > -judy > > > > >> ThumpThumpThump > > > > >So now I’m a bitch am I… well gee thanks for your high opinon of my > > > > >parentege… I’ll tell them should I. > > > > It doesnt matter to me. Do what you wish. > > > > >sorry to offend you your highness… > > > > I claim no highness, just request, like many members of the group hav > > > > over various times, that our first names be used. > > > > but I made a simple error because I > > > > >DID NOT KNOW that you were so thing about it… don’t worry yourself > now > > > > >- in answer to your request, I will never talk to you again – I know > you > > > > >don’t want me here in the first place. > > > > I never said such a thing. Could you point out the post in which I > > > > said it, to back up that allegation? > > > > >So that’s it from me for now, to you anyway… > > > > As I said, whatever you wish. > > > > >Have a nice life person of possibly female gender or possibly > something > > > > >else entirely… > > > > My gender is meaningless. Why the insult? I apologise for calling > > > > you a bitch. > > > > >Karen, who is NOT afraid to use her name in posts. > > > > Some people in this world are changing jobs, and do not want thier > > > > first names posted all over tarnation. Like it or not stigma exists. > > > > >PS Want me to killfile you so there is no chance of my ever > accidentally > > > > >offending again? > > > > Again, that is up to you. > > > > Would that satisfy your ladyship??? > > > > ? You think I’m no lady and I’m certainly not a ship, and why you > > > > seem to think that I have placed myself on a pedestal I do not know. > > > > I apologized for the bitch comment–it just seemed to incredibly > > > > obvious to not use a persons name without permission. > > > > Thumper > > > > Thumper > > > > ThumpThumpThump
Response:
hhhehehehehe. I have told people, on occasion, that they were the son of a bitch’s mother’s crablice. I heard that one was quite colorful to many. Aside from mild outbursts such as those, I think I’m just dandy. Just not popular with all. OHHH well. Thumper Gimme some wierd mood. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hey there, honey, I was catching up so I sent this post before I saw the > apologies, sorry! :-) > Anyways, I don’t think any of your posts (excluding said post) have come off > as bitchy. I think you do just fine, however, I don’t consider > intellectually challenging posts to be bitchy either, so I guess I just > don’t see your other posts as bitchy! Can we say redundancy? > lol > -judy > *in a wierd mood* > > Heya Thump, > > I am only speaking for me when I say that I had no idea that their was a > > problem with using peoples’ real names. I can understand why there > would be > > and all, however, I had never thought about it previously and now am > > wondering if I have ever used *your* name specifically in posts that I > have > > written to you. > No. You havent <G>. > Just wondering…I do think that maybe Kaji didn’t know > > though and you might have been just a *little* hard on her. > Perhaps, and that is why I posted an apology for the harshness of my > tone. People seemed to have missed that and continue to jump to Kaji’s > defense, as if I were continuing some tirade against her. I am not. > > Please don’t think I am trying to jump into the middle here, it’s just > that > > I am almost positive that I would have done the same and would be > absolutely > > shocked if I had gotten the same response from you. Actually I have > never > > seen you angry, so your post shocked me regardless. > Heh-if you ever want to, scroll through some of my posts. <G> I can be > a real bitch, usually either blatantly blunt or logically sarcastic. I > is who I is. > I understand where you’re coming from, but you should know that we have > made up (I think.) > SMOOOCH G|F > See you round the cafe…. > Thump > > Just my 2 cents. > > -judy > > > >> ThumpThumpThump > > > >So now I’m a bitch am I… well gee thanks for your high opinon of my > > > >parentege… I’ll tell them should I. > > > It doesnt matter to me. Do what you wish. > > > >sorry to offend you your highness… > > > I claim no highness, just request, like many members of the group hav > > > over various times, that our first names be used. > > > but I made a simple error because I > > > >DID NOT KNOW that you were so thing about it… don’t worry yourself > now > > > >- in answer to your request, I will never talk to you again – I know > you > > > >don’t want me here in the first place. > > > I never said such a thing. Could you point out the post in which I > > > said it, to back up that allegation? > > > >So that’s it from me for now, to you anyway… > > > As I said, whatever you wish. > > > >Have a nice life person of possibly female gender or possibly > something > > > >else entirely… > > > My gender is meaningless. Why the insult? I apologise for calling > > > you a bitch. > > > >Karen, who is NOT afraid to use her name in posts. > > > Some people in this world are changing jobs, and do not want thier > > > first names posted all over tarnation. Like it or not stigma exists. > > > >PS Want me to killfile you so there is no chance of my ever > accidentally > > > >offending again? > > > Again, that is up to you. > > > Would that satisfy your ladyship??? > > > ? You think I’m no lady and I’m certainly not a ship, and why you > > > seem to think that I have placed myself on a pedestal I do not know. > > > I apologized for the bitch comment–it just seemed to incredibly > > > obvious to not use a persons name without permission. > > > Thumper > > > Thumper > > > ThumpThumpThump